Already Joseph Alois Schumpeter (1942) emphasized that innovative activities are to be considered as an active search (or R&D) process for new possibilities and opportunities rather than a solely accidental event. Besides the investment of R&D-funds this search process also requires certain tasks such as screening, recombining, modifying and even consciously rejecting already existing know-how. An analytical treatment of these tasks obviously has to cover a broad range of topics such as learning, perception, decision under uncertainty, creativity, etc. The approach we follow in the proposed paper, however, is rather modest, and we want to emphasize two aspects, the ability to absorb outside knowledge and the knowledge creating effects of search procedures.
Central to both of these points of investigation is the existence of technological spillovers which are of special importance in an evolutionary context. There the cumulativeness of technological progress and the boundedness of search routines imply that firms engaging in R&D develop along certain technological trajectories (Dosi (1988)). Those development paths obviously do not allow for a continous progress forever but their technological potential decreases with increasing progress. In economic reality, however, an unsteady but continuous progress is to be observed. This is to be interpreted in a way that single technologies are again and again influenced positively by their environment.
An important source of such effects are the technological spillovers. Those can come from other firms, but also from universities and other research institutes. Technological spillovers are of course nothing new for traditional economic theory. There they are dealt with as positive externalities which, however, reduce the entrepreneurial's incentive to engage in R&D. Therefore, from a welfare-theoretical point of view, the total level of R&D is sub-optimal. Our approach want to modify this view twofold. First, we consider technological spillovers not primarily as incentive-reducing, but as ideas-creating. Second, we want to take account of the fact that technological spillovers - contrary to some traditional approaches - cannot easily be adopted by imitators but that they have to satisfy certain prerequisites and technological capabilities. In this respect, the absorp-tive capacities gain special importance (Cohen/Levinthal (1989)). They put a firm in the position to understand and adopt know-how generated elsewhere - or in other words, they make technological spillovers work as they are supposed to work, i.e. making knowledge created by A useful for B.
On this basis our paper is concerned with alternative firm strategies where the capacity to use technological spillovers plays a central role. We distinguish between one strategy which invests in absorptive capabilities in order to utilize spillover effects, another which relies only on own R&D endeavours, and several intermediate cases. We investigate in a simulation study three different scenarios: Starting with a model calibration with a relatively high degree of economic competition and a large spillover pool, a calibration with low economic competion and a calibration with small spillover possibilities are run alternatively.
As the most important result of our study we find that the absorptive strategy is very likely to dominate a conservative strategy in the long run. Only in technologically homogenous environments or with perfect patent protection the latter strategy might be superior.
COHEN, W. M., LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1989), Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D, Economic Journal, Vol. 99.
DOSI, G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXVI, S.1127.
SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th edn., London: Allen&Unwin, 1976.
Contact:
University of Augsburg, Department of Economics, Universitätsstr. 16, D-86135 Augsburg
Ph.: +49 821 598 4179, Fax: +49 821 598 4229, e-Mail: Andreas Pyka